Naming Our Community (Part 1)
01 Jan 2015

Naming Our Community (Part 1)

On December 12, 4 days after we

01 Jan 2015

On December 12, 4 days after we were elected, we announced that we had a plan, and that our first priority was to focus on the naming and branding.

Why start with naming

We felt that starting with our brand story was important. It would provide the necessary rhetoric we’ve been lacking to both rally around as a group and speak about our community to the outside world. The lack of language made it particularly difficult for ambassadors to address questions from potential candidates, the press or any other local partner.

Our naming objective

In determining the process to select our community’s name, we kept one goal in mind: to create a strong and ownable brand, one that would encapsulate our values, rally the community, and portray who we are to the outside world.

The Branding Committee: a robust base

Fortunately, the Branding Committee, led by our fearless Radha Mistry and Aisha Sheikh, had already done heaps of work to facilitate the process. On July 30, the Committee polled the community through an online survey to surface the values you (our members) most cherished. From the poll, the committee worked on the mission and vision proposals*, which we then used to forge the following brand narrative:

HQ is a global community of millennial innovators and thought leaders, bound by values of contribution, curiosity and creativity. We empower people to drive global change by designing opportunities to have meaningful conversations harnessing technology, adventures and workshops. We are over 900 members present in 40 cities on all 5 continents, from serial entrepreneurs to opera singers to policy makers.

We used this brand narrative as the base for our naming process. For more information on the process we followed, read on to Naming our Community (Part 2).

* For more information on the Branding Committee and their work, please read our detailed blog post.

Leave a comment
More Posts
Comments
  1. Yezin Al-Qaysi January 6th, 2015 1:36PM

    Overall a great brand statement. I believe this phrase is a mushy though: “We empower people to drive global change by designing opportunities to have meaningful conversations harnessing technology, adventures and workshops. ”

    Drive global change: what kind of change are we driving, is a focus on this type of change clearly outlined in our mandate (?)…

    It seems scattered because it mentions a series of activities that are advancing some undefined change agenda. We’re harnessing technology towards what end, we’re having meaningful conversations to advance what, adventures are great but how do we tie it to “global change” and I love workshops, but I feel its on a different scope level than what the overall statement is trying to acheive.

    It’s always tricky when an organization sets out to drive global change. What type of global change and how exactly we, as an organization, choose to achieve it will need to be defined (before or after the naming process).

    Just some thoughts. Cheers 🙂

Comment